DWI Jury Trial
Not Guilty Verdict
Client stopped and arrested by Dallas Police for speeding and weaving. Charged with DWI. Jury Trial. Client found not guilty.
Criminal Defense Results
Client stopped and arrested by Dallas Police for speeding and weaving. Charged with DWI. Jury Trial. Client found not guilty.
Client stopped by DeSoto Police. He allegedly failed field tests and was arrested for DWI. He admitted to 10 beers on police video. Jury Trial. Client found not guilty.
Client stopped by Dallas Police for speeding and failure to maintain single lane of traffic. Arrested for DWI. Jury trial. Client found not guilty.
Client arrested for DWI 2nd by DFW Airport Police. Jury Trial. Client found not guilty.
Client stopped by DART police for defective license plate light. Client given field sobriety tests and arrested for DWI. Jury Trial. Client found not guilty.
Client charged with prostitution by Dallas Police for allegedly propositioning an undercover officer. Jury Trial. Client found not guilty.
Client charged with felony injury to a child. The State offered 40 years in prison prior to trial. Jury trial. Client found not guilty.
Client was charged with serving alcohol to minor. Client worked at convenience store and allegedly sold alcohol to undercover agent for TABC. Jury trial. Client found not guilty.
Client stopped and arrested for DWI. Mr. Robinson filed a Motion to Suppress challenging the legality of the stop. Motion granted, case dismissed.
Client was arrested and charged with murder. Mr. Robinson presented self defense issues to the grand jury. Case was no-billed, charges were dropped.
Client arrested for forgery of check, Mr. Robinson presented defense issues to grand jury, case no billed, charges dropped.
Client charged with possessing prohibited weapon. Motion to suppress challenging the stop of the Defendant filed. Contested hearing. Motion granted. Case dismissed.
Client was stopped by Coppell Police and arrested for DWI. Jury Trial. Client found not guilty.
Client stopped by Euless Police for running stop sign and hitting curb. Arrested and charged with DWI. Jury Trial. Client found not guilty.
Client arrested by Irving Police for DWI. Jury Trial. Client found not guilty.
Client was arrested by Bedford Police for allegedly assaulting son-in-law. Jury Trial. Client found not guilty.
Client charged with assault bodily injury after an altercation with his girlfriend. Jury Trial. Client found not guilty.
Client stopped and arrested by Irving Police for having an illegal knife in his vehicle. Jury Trial. Client found not guilty.
Client charged with assault against his girlfriend. Jury Trial. Client found not guilty.
Client was charged with carrying a pistol in his vehicle. The offense date was prior to the recent changes in the law. Jury trial. Client found not guilty.
Client was arrested for sexual assault after going on date with a female acquaintance. Mr. Robinson presented evidence to the grand jury. Case was no-billed, charges dropped.
Client was charged with felony endangering a child. Mr. Robinson presented evidence to the grand jury that was not contained in police report. Case no-billed, charges dropped.
Client charged with felony possession of controlled substance. Mr. Robinson filed a Motion to Suppress challenging the search that resulted in the arrest. After a contested hearing, the Judge granted the Motion. Case dismissed.
Client charged with DWI. He was arrested because the police officer thought he heard gunfire coming from Defendant’s vehicle. Contested Motion to Suppress hearing held.
Motion granted. Case dismissed.
Disclaimer: Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future case. Every criminal case is different and is decided on its own particular facts and the specific laws that apply. The results described here were dependent on the individual facts and circumstances of each matter — including the specific charges, the evidence, the client’s criminal history, the jurisdiction, and other factors — and should not be understood to suggest that the same or similar results can be obtained in your case. Case results do not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of any legal matter. The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely on advertisements or reported case results.