When a Texas executor fails to protect estate property, complete required filings, provide a required accounting, or distribute property without a continuing need for administration, an interested person can use the probate process to ask the court to intervene.
A slow Texas probate administration does not necessarily mean the executor has neglected the estate. The first step is usually to identify the executor’s unfinished duty, determine whether the administration is independent or court-supervised, and review the will, probate orders, court filings, and applicable deadlines.
Independent or Court-Supervised: Why It Matters
Texas allows two kinds of administration, and which one applies determines how closely the court is watching—and how much of what the executor does ends up on the public record.
Independent administration must be affirmatively created. Usually the will creates it — the testator names an independent executor or directs that the estate be administered independently (Tex. Est. Code § 401.001). If the will is silent, or there is no will, the estate can still be administered independently, but only if everyone who inherits agrees in writing and the court approves (§§ 401.002–.003). The person appointed that way is an independent administrator rather than an independent executor. Either way, the independent representative collects assets, pays debts, and distributes property without asking the court for permission each time. That is not the same as being unaccountable: the representative still files an inventory (or affidavit in lieu of one), notifies beneficiaries and creditors, and can be called to account or removed.
Dependent administration is what happens when independent administration is not established—no will and no agreement among the heirs, a will that does not provide for it, a dispute over who should serve, or a court that declines to approve it. The representative generally needs a court order before selling property, paying claims, or making distributions, files annual accountings, and usually posts a bond. It is slower and more expensive, but that oversight is the point when beneficiaries do not trust one another, a will is contested, the estate is insolvent, or the representative’s conduct is already in question.
For a beneficiary, the practical difference is visibility. In a dependent administration, much of what you want to know is already in the court file. In an independent administration, far less is filed — so getting information, or getting the court involved, takes an affirmative request.
What Is a Texas Executor Required to Do?
A Texas executor is the personal representative named in a will and appointed by the probate court to administer the estate. Not every personal representative is an executor. When someone dies without a will, the court appoints an administrator. When there is a will but no named executor is able or willing to serve, the court appoints an administrator with will annexed. And when independent administration is created by agreement rather than by the will, the person appointed is an independent administrator. The Estates Code uses personal representative as the umbrella term for all of them (§ 22.031), and defines independent executor to include an independent administrator (§ 22.017) — so the statutes below that refer to an “independent executor” apply either way.
This article uses executor where the person was named in a will and personal representative where the rule applies regardless of how the person was appointed. Whatever the title, the representative acts on behalf of the estate and must follow the will, applicable court orders, and the Texas Estates Code. The duties below apply in both kinds of administration — what changes is the procedure and how much reaches the court file.
Protect and Collect Estate Property
The personal representative must collect and take possession of the estate’s personal property and records. Under Texas Estates Code § 351.101, the representative must take care of estate property as a prudent person would care for their own. Section 351.102 imposes a separate duty: to use ordinary diligence to collect claims and debts owed to the estate and to recover property to which the estate has a claim
Depending on the estate, these duties may include securing a home, maintaining insurance, protecting vehicles and valuables, managing financial accounts, collecting money owed to the deceased person, and preventing waste or unauthorized use. Allowing insurance to lapse, leaving a house exposed to avoidable damage, or permitting unexplained removal of estate property may raise questions about whether the representative is fulfilling this duty.
Identify and Report Estate Assets
One of the personal representative’s first major jobs is to find out what the estate owns and report it.
Under §309.051, the personal representative must file an inventory of the estate’s known property within 90 days after qualifying. The inventory lists what the estate owns and what each item is worth. The court can extend that deadline, and a few other parts of the code can change it.
In an independent administration, §309.056 may let the independent executor file a short affidavit instead of putting the full inventory in the public court file. For that to be allowed, two things must be true. First, when the inventory is due, the estate can have no unpaid debts other than secured debts, taxes, and the costs of administering the estate. Second, the executor must have already given the beneficiaries a sworn, complete, and detailed list of the estate’s property and its value. The law calls that list a “verified, full, and detailed inventory and appraisement.” The affidavit is due in the same 90-day window as the inventory.
The executor does not have to send that inventory to every beneficiary. Section 309.056(b-1) names three exceptions: a beneficiary whose gifts under the will are worth $2,000 or less, a beneficiary who has already received everything the will leaves them by the time the affidavit is filed, and a beneficiary who has signed a written waiver of the right to receive it.
Those beneficiaries can still get the inventory, but they must ask for it in writing. Once they do, the executor must provide it. Section 309.056(c) goes further: anyone with an interest in the estate may ask the independent executor in writing for a copy. If the executor does not provide it, that person can ask the court to order it.
Property often turns up after the inventory or affidavit is filed. When it does, §309.101 requires a supplemental inventory or affidavit covering it.
Provide Notices Required by Law
Texas law requires a personal representative to provide specific notices, even though the representative may not have a duty to give every beneficiary constant informal updates.
Under §308.002, the personal representative must notify covered beneficiaries within 60 days after the court signs the order admitting the will to probate. Notice is not required for certain beneficiaries who have appeared in the proceeding, received all their gifts, received a copy or summary of the will and signed a valid waiver, or are entitled to aggregate gifts valued at $2,000 or less.
According to §308.004, the representative must file proof of compliance with the beneficiary-notice requirements by the 90th day after the order admitting the will to probate. The filing identifies beneficiaries who received notice, those who fell within an exception, and any beneficiary whose identity or address could not be determined through reasonable diligence. The beneficiary-notice requirements in §§ 308.002 and 308.004 are triggered by an order admitting a will to probate, so they apply only where there is a will. The creditor-notice requirements below apply in every administration, with or without one.
Under §308.051, the representative must publish notice to creditors within one month after receiving letters testamentary or of administration. Under §308.053, known creditors with monetary claims secured by estate property must receive separate notice within two months after the letters are issued. A secured creditor discovered later must receive notice within a reasonable period after the representative obtains actual knowledge of the claim.
Address Valid Debts and Estate Expenses
The personal representative must review the claims that creditors file against the estate. The representative approves some claims. Others are settled by a lawsuit. Either way, the estate does not pay its bills in the order the bills arrive.
Texas law sorts estate claims into eight classes and pays them in that order. Section 355.102 sets the classes:
- Funeral expenses and the expenses of the last illness of the person who died, up to a combined total of $15,000
- Expenses of administering the estate, including the cost of preserving and managing estate property
- Secured claims, including tax liens, paid out of the property that secures them
- Confirmed child support arrearages
- State tax claims, plus penalties and interest
- Costs of confinement owed to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice
- Repayment of state medical assistance payments
- All other claims
Two points matter most to families. Funeral and last-illness costs do come first, but only up to $15,000 combined. Anything above that amount drops to Class 8 under §355.103 and gets paid last, alongside ordinary unsecured debts. And when the estate cannot pay everything it owes, the representative cannot pay a lower-class debt ahead of a higher-class one.
Most of the claim procedures in Chapter 355 do not apply to an independent administration. Section 403.058 says so directly. The priority classes are the exception. Under §403.051(a)(3), an independent executor must classify and pay approved or established claims “in the same order of priority, classification, and proration prescribed in this title.” The eight classes above still control, even though the executor is not following the rest of the Chapter 355 process. Proration means that when the estate cannot pay every claim in a class, each claim in that class receives the same percentage.
Timing matters too. An executor who pays the wrong bill at the wrong time can end up covering the loss out of their own pocket. Section 403.0585 protects an independent executor from that result, but only when two things are true. First, the claim must not be too old to enforce under the statute of limitations. Second, when the executor pays the claim, they must reasonably believe the estate will have enough left to pay every other claim against it. An executor who hands out estate property to beneficiaries before working out what the estate owes — enforceable debts, taxes, administration expenses, and family allowances — gives up that protection and can be on the hook personally.
Distribute Property Under the Will and Texas Law
After the personal representative identifies the assets, addresses enforceable claims, pays necessary expenses, and completes the estate’s remaining work, the representative should distribute the property to the people entitled to receive it — the beneficiaries named in the will, or the heirs determined under the intestacy statutes if there is no will. The executor cannot rewrite the will based on personal preferences or withhold property merely because of a disagreement with a beneficiary.
A delay may be justified when the estate still needs funds for taxes, disputed claims, litigation, administration expenses, a property sale, or another continuing administrative need. The executor should be able to identify the unfinished work and explain why retaining the property remains necessary.
Does a Slow Probate Case Mean the Executor Is Neglecting the Estate?
No. A slow probate case does not by itself prove neglect, misconduct, or mismanagement.
A personal representative may need additional time to sell real estate, locate beneficiaries, resolve creditor claims, determine ownership of disputed property, complete tax filings, defend a lawsuit, or collect money owed to the estate. Market conditions, title problems, necessary repairs, and disputes among interested parties may also delay administration.
Delay becomes more concerning when there is little evidence that the personal representative is continuing to perform necessary work or when estate property is at risk. Warning signs may include:
- Failing to secure, insure, maintain, or preserve estate property
- Missing required probate filings without obtaining an extension
- Refusing to identify estate assets or explain significant transactions
- Mixing estate money with the representative’s personal funds
- Using estate property for personal benefit without authority
- Selling property for an unexplained or unreasonably low amount
- Paying selected beneficiaries while ignoring estate debts or other beneficiaries
- Failing to respond to a proper statutory demand for an accounting
- Disobeying a probate court order
- Keeping the estate open without a continuing administrative need
The difference often depends on whether there is a documented reason for the delay and whether the executor is actively completing the work needed to administer the estate.
What Can a Beneficiary Do About an Executor’s Inaction?
A beneficiary may request information, demand an accounting when the statutory requirements are met, petition for estate distribution, or ask the probate court to remove the personal representative. The appropriate procedure depends on whether the estate is independently administered or court-supervised and on the duty the representative allegedly failed to perform.
Request Specific Information About the Estate
A focused written request is often a useful first step. The request might ask for the status of the inventory, a list of remaining estate assets, an explanation of unpaid debts, information about a proposed property sale, or the expected sequence for completing the administration.
A specific request may help distinguish a communication problem from a larger failure to administer the estate. The person making the request should keep a copy and preserve any response.
Demand an Accounting From an Independent Executor
After 15 months have passed from the date the court clerk first issued letters testamentary or of administration, a person interested in an independently administered estate may demand a sworn written accounting from the independent executor, as set out in §404.001. The accounting must identify the estate property the executor received, explain what happened to that property, and list debts and expenses that have been paid or remain outstanding. It must also identify property still in the executor’s possession, provide other information needed to understand the estate’s condition, and explain why the estate should remain open if continued administration is necessary. Because the Estates Code defines “independent executor” to include an independent administrator, this remedy is available whether or not the decedent left a will.
The independent executor has 60 days after receiving the demand to provide the accounting. If the executor does not comply, the person who made the demand may file an action in probate court to compel the accounting. After an initial accounting, interested persons may demand additional accountings at intervals of at least 12 months.
Review Annual Accounts in a Court-Supervised Administration
Under §359.001, different accounting rules apply in a dependent, or court-supervised, administration. Unless the court grants an extension, a personal representative administering an estate under court order generally must file the first annual account no later than the 60th day after the first anniversary of qualifying and receiving letters. The representative generally must file another annual account no later than the 60th day after each later anniversary until the estate closes, unless the court extends the deadline. The account must address the claims, receipts, disbursements, remaining property, taxes, and other information required for an annual estate accounting, set forth in §359.002.
Because independent and dependent administrations follow different procedures, the probate order and court file should be reviewed before deciding which accounting remedy applies.
Petition for Accounting and Distribution After Two Years
After two years have passed since the court clerk first issued letters testamentary or of administration, an interested person in an independently administered estate may petition the probate court for an accounting and distribution, under §405.001. After reviewing the accounting and holding a hearing, the court must order distribution unless it finds a continuing need for administration. If some work remains, the court may still order distribution of the portion of the estate that no longer needs to be held.
A continuing need may involve unresolved litigation, unpaid claims, tax obligations, or property that must be sold or partitioned before distribution. The two-year provision does not require every estate to close within exactly two years. It creates a court procedure for determining whether continued administration remains justified.
Ask the Court to Remove the Executor
A beneficiary cannot personally remove a personal representative, but an interested person may ask the probate court to do so when a statutory ground exists. Removal is a serious remedy and generally requires more than poor communication, personality conflicts, or an ordinary disagreement about how the estate should be handled.
After personal service and a hearing, a probate court may remove an independent executor when certain statutory grounds are established, under §404.0035. Those grounds include failing to provide an accounting required by law, engaging in gross misconduct or gross mismanagement, becoming legally incapable of performing the required duties, or having a material conflict of interest that prevents proper performance.
The same law also permits the court, on its own motion and after giving 30 days’ written notice, to remove an independent executor who failed to qualify as required, missed the inventory or affidavit-in-lieu deadline without an extension, or failed to file the required affidavit or certificate concerning beneficiary notices.
Under §404.003, in more limited circumstances, the court may remove an independent executor without prior notice when the executor cannot be served for specified reasons or sufficient grounds support a belief that the executor has misapplied, embezzled, or is about to misapply or embezzle estate property.
Under §404.0036, when an independent executor is removed, the court’s order must state the reason for removal, direct how the remaining estate property will be handled, and require the executor’s letters to be surrendered and canceled. The court may appoint a successor representative to complete the administration.
Different removal grounds apply in a dependent, or court-supervised, administration, set forth in §361.052. The representative removed there may be an executor named in a will or an administrator appointed by the court; the grounds are the same either way. These grounds include failing to return a required account, disobeying a proper court order, gross misconduct, mismanagement, incapacity, or failing to make a final settlement by the third anniversary of the issuance of letters. The court may extend the three-year period when sufficient cause is shown.
Removal does not automatically resolve questions about missing property, improper payments, or losses already suffered by the estate. Those issues may require separate claims or additional court orders.
What Evidence Can Show That an Executor Is Not Performing Their Duties?
The probate file and the estate’s financial records often provide the clearest picture of whether the representative is completing required work. Relevant probate records may include the order admitting the will to probate (or the judgment declaring heirship, if there was no will), letters testamentary or letters of administration, the order authorizing independent or dependent administration, the inventory or affidavit in lieu of inventory, beneficiary and creditor notices, annual accounts, and prior court orders.
Bank statements, investment records, tax filings, appraisals, contracts, closing statements, creditor-payment records, insurance documents, repair invoices, and communications with the executor may help show how estate property has been managed. Records showing the personal use, unexplained transfer, or below-market sale of estate property may be especially important when misconduct is suspected. For example, a delay in selling a house may be reasonable if the executor is completing repairs, resolving a title problem, or waiting for court approval. The same delay may raise different concerns if taxes and insurance remain unpaid, the property is deteriorating, the executor is living there without accounting for that benefit, or purchase offers are being concealed.
How Bailey & Galyen Can Help With an Executor Dispute
Concerns about an executor can involve both the practical administration of the estate and formal probate remedies. The first step is often to identify the type of administration, review the court file, determine which duties remain unfinished, and separate an explainable delay from conduct that may justify court intervention.
Bailey & Galyen can review available probate documents, explain the general duties of a Texas executor or administrator, and discuss procedures such as a statutory demand for an accounting, an action to compel an accounting, a petition for accounting and distribution, or a request to remove a personal representative.
Contact Bailey & Galyen to discuss concerns about a Texas probate administration or an executor’s handling of estate property. A consultation can help identify which records, deadlines, and probate procedures may apply.
Frequently Asked Questions
1.Can a beneficiary remove an executor in Texas?
A beneficiary cannot personally remove an executor, but a beneficiary who qualifies as an interested person may ask the probate court to order removal of the executor or representative when a statutory ground exists. Poor communication or disagreement alone generally is not enough.
Depending on the type of administration, grounds for removal may include failure to provide a required accounting, gross misconduct or gross mismanagement, legal incapacity, certain conflicts of interest, or misapplication of estate property.
2. What can a beneficiary do if estate property appears to be missing or misused?
A beneficiary who suspects estate mismanagement can begin by asking the executor for a specific explanation and reviewing the available probate records. An unexplained transaction, missing property, or continued failure to perform required duties may justify further action.
Depending on the type of administration and the issue involved, an interested person may be able to demand an accounting, file an action to compel an accounting, or ask the probate court to remove the personal representative. The appropriate procedure depends on what the executor is alleged to have done or failed to do.
3. Does it cost money to demand an accounting or file for removal?
Yes. A beneficiary who files an action to compel an accounting or petitions to remove an executor generally must cover their own filing fees and attorney’s fees to bring the case. In some circumstances a Texas court may order the executor to pay costs or attorney’s fees, particularly when the executor is found to have acted in bad faith or breached a fiduciary duty.
4. What happens to estate property while a removal request is pending in court?
The personal representative generally continues to manage estate property while a removal petition is pending, unless the court intervenes. A beneficiary who believes property is at immediate risk can ask the court for emergency relief, such as a temporary restraining order or the appointment of a temporary administrator, to protect the estate until the removal request is decided.
Hablamos español en nuestra oficina.
Bailey & Galyen – Solving Your Legal Puzzle®
Español 
English